sstoker

Opinion: New York’s answer to the eviction crisis triggered by COVID-19 needs a successor

By Zac Hale

It has been a year since the statewide eviction moratorium ended in January 2022, and though the lingering economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are still with us, renters are about to lose another crucial protection.  

New York’s Emergency Rental Assistance Program is set to close its application process on Jan. 20, 2023.  This program has been a much-needed lifeline to renters, assisting with the rental debt of over 22,000 tenants across New York. The program serves as an eviction protection, as applicants are protected by a stay that pauses tenants’ eviction proceedings until the state Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance makes a decision on their application. An active stay not only prevents evictions, but postpones court dates, alleviating the strain on judicial resources. The program’s closure comes after months of extensions in hopes of renewed funding. With housing attorneys overwhelmed by the rate and number of eviction cases being pushed through court, and New York City’s homeless shelters under historic strain, the sunsetting of the Emergency Rental Assistance Program will create a gap in tenant protections that governments should be eager to fill.

The pandemic shattered business-as-usual in every facet of public and private life, leading activists and politicians to put forward bold proposals to match the scale of the crises at hand. Government responded to public pressure by expanding unemployment insurance and other benefits, sending out stimulus checks and pausing payments on mortgages and student debt. Struggling tenants pushed for – and won – exceptional interventions including a moratorium on evictions and large-scale funding for payment of rental debt.   

While these measures were controversial, it is crucial for New York’s policymakers and housing advocates to remember that they worked and prevented even greater numbers of New Yorkers becoming homeless or housing insecure. Recognizing the value of safe and stable housing in reducing exposure to diseases, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention imposed a nationwide ban on evictions in 2020 to slow the spread of COVID-19. Early research has supported their actions, with multiple studies showing increased rates of COVID-19 exposure and deaths in states where eviction moratoriums were lifted. Moreover, even before the pandemic, studies of the impacts of eviction have found a strong link between eviction and poor health outcomes, including substance abuse, more frequent need for emergency care and higher mortality. 

New York provided even stronger protections in the Tenant Safe Harbor Act of 2020, which delayed or prevented evictions for millions of tenants who suffered coronavirus-related hardships. The state extended these protections multiple times while fighting both the deadly virus and the crises that spread in its wake, with the battle to control the pandemic raging alongside battles for racial, social and economic justice. Each potential expiration of protections brought political conflict over renewal, but each successful extension increased the safety and security of New Yorkers who would otherwise face the dire conditions associated with eviction and resulting debt judgments.  

At Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation A, we served thousands of clients who faced financial hardships during the early months of the pandemic. These setbacks triggered chain reactions that leave many of our clients vulnerable to this day. Loss of income paired with increased child care and medical expenses led tenants to exhaust what savings they had, taking away not only their means of paying rent but their ability to endure the costs of moving. While many hundreds of these clients received a life raft in the form of Emergency Rental Assistance Program assistance, many more remain on a thin edge of stability. Now, the recent spikes in the cost of living are pushing many families into deeper debt, with households forced to pick between increasingly expensive groceries and payment of rent or other bills.   

While many of the emergency protections designed to address COVID-19 have lapsed, the human impact of the pandemic remains an urgent crisis. This crisis, which already overlapped with other crises and systemic inequities that preceded COVID-19, is now set to be amplified by further economic shocks. Rather than cutting costs and winding down protections, elected officials should push for a renewed commitment to the safety and stability of New Yorkers.  

The Emergency Rental Assistance Program kept renters in their homes, helped landlords make their mortgage payments and saved the scarce resources of our court system. It worked before, and it can work again. Whether New York extends the current program or creates another system that protects and assists renters, the closure of the program’s application signals the opening of new opportunities for bold action. With courage and conviction, we can weather this crisis and the next, together.

Original Article: https://www.cityandstateny.com/opinion/2023/01/opinion-new-yorks-answer-eviction-crisis-triggered-covid-19-needs-successor/381830/

JOHN JAY’S ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT EARNS HIGH SCORE ON FEDERAL RESERVE’S ECONOMIC EDUCATION INCLUSION INDEX

John Jay’s Economics department has only been around for 10 years but it’s quickly making a name for itself. Ranking among the top 10 in the Federal Reserve’s Economic Education Inclusion Index—it was number seven on the index and ranked first among colleges in the City University of New York (CUNY) system—John Jay’s Economics department grants a large number of degrees to students who are Black, Latinx, and women, three underrepresented groups that are often excluded from the economics field. “The diversity of students at John Jay and the fact that most come from New York City working-class families creates a great atmosphere for teaching economics,” says Geert Dhondt, Chair and Professor in the Department of Economics, who attributes the department’s achievements to the College’s commitment to student success and mission of increasing social mobility for underrepresented groups.“Teaching students at John Jay is one of my greatest joys, because our students are engaged, excited to learn, and open to the world.”

“The diversity of students at John Jay and the fact that most come from New York City working-class families creates a great atmosphere for teaching economics.” —Geert Dhondt

Acknowledging the Numbers
When you look at how many Black and Latinx folks earn a degree in Economics and compare it to the country’s population, the numbers are staggering. “Black and Latinx people make up about 30 percent of the U.S. population, and women make up just over half of the population, but this isn’t the case in the field of Economics,” explains Dhondt, as he illustrates the deep disparity. “Together, Black and Latinx graduates make up only 11 percent of those receiving a bachelor’s degree in Economics, and on the master’s degree level, Black and Latinx people make up only four percent,” he says, adding that for women, those numbers hover at about 30 percent for both degrees. “But John Jay’s Economics program is remarkably different,” says Dhondt. “Women make up over half of all bachelor’s degrees awarded, while Latinx graduates make up 43 percent and Black graduates make up 23 percent. In our master’s program, Black and Latinx students make up a total of 67 percent of our graduates and women 50 percent.”

(left to right) Student Giovanni Suarez discussing his research, on how Neoliberalism privatizes profits and socializes losses in Ecuador, with Professor Ian Seda-Irizarry.
 (left to right) Student Giovanni Suarez discussing his research, on how Neoliberalism privatizes profits and socializes losses in Ecuador, with Professor Ian Seda-Irizarry.

“We live in an unjust world and studying economics is fundamental to understanding all of those struggles for justice.” —Geert Dhondt

Building a Department
The department’s success with students can be attributed to a number of important factors: a faculty that’s devoted to seeing its student’s earn their degree; the department’s strong connection with alumni, many of whom come back to teach in some capacity; a curriculum that is reflective of the students’ experiences; and the department’s approach to teaching a number of economic theories. All of this was done by design, according to Dhondt who arrived at John Jay in 2009. “When I first came to John Jay, it was still transitioning to a senior college. Economics was one of the first new liberal arts majors, and the department was brand new which created an enormous opportunity for us to really shape the major and align it with the College’s justice-focused mission,” explains Dhondt, further linking Economics with justice. “We live in an unjust world and studying economics is fundamental to understanding all of those struggles for justice. Understanding capitalism is needed in order to explain the reason why these injustices exist and continue. Injustices don’t exist because rich and powerful people are mean; injustices exist because of the way the economic system is set up to benefit some and hurt others.”

As they built the department, Dhondt and his colleagues focused on getting rid of what was deemed “traditional economics baggage,” and instead embraced an array of economic theories that were more relatable and accessible to students. “In the popular imagination, economics is confusing, technical and has to do with money, finance, banking, interest rates, and the stock markets,” says Dhondt, adding that traditional mainstream, neoclassical economics focuses on a small part of economics and how individuals make choices in an environment constrained by scarcity. “But it’s not only about those things. Economics is fundamentally about relationships between people. It studies how the structure of institutions, the behavior of groups of people, and the behavior of individuals generate patterns in the spheres of production, distribution and consumption of goods and services while addressing fundamental questions such as: what gets made; who has to make it; who gets to consume it; and who profits? In creating this department, we wanted our students to know that economics encompasses so much more.”

“Injustices exist because of the way the economic system is set up to benefit some and hurt others.” —Geert Dhondt

With the goal of reimagining economics, Dhondt along with the entire department, decided to teach the subject through a more relatable and approachable lens—the working-class perspective. “At John Jay, we consciously made a choice to teach economics from a working-class perspective, which deeply resonates with our working-class students,” he says, explaining that by using a pluralism of economic theories they are better able to engage students. “Our students are not just exposed to neoclassical economics but also to alternative economic theories like Institutional, Post-Keynesian, Feminist, Stratification, Modern Monetary, Marxian, and Austrian Economics, that often make more instinctive sense and are relatable to their own life experiences.”

Economics Professor Michelle Holder gives out an award during the Omicron Delta Epsilon, an economics honor society, award ceremony.
Economics Professor Michelle Holder gives out an award during the Omicron Delta Epsilon,
an economics honor society, award ceremony.

“If more economists from underrepresented groups join the ranks of the economics profession, the economics discipline itself will change, and that’s a good thing.” —Geert Dhondt

Diversifying the Field
Diversity is one of John Jay’s greatest assets and for the Economics field diversity is exactly what’s needed to help it evolve. “Increasing diversity is crucially important because it will change the nature of economics both by the way it’s studied as a field and what is studied in economics.” Citing examples, Dhondt shows how voices and perspectives from diverse backgrounds can help change systems. “Think of it this way, if you look at the sport of tennis, Venus and Serena Williams didn’t just join tennis, they changed the sport. That’s powerful. If more economists from underrepresented groups join the ranks of the economics profession, the economics discipline itself will change, and that’s a good thing.”

Economics Professor Sara Bernardo teaching.
Economics Professor Sara Bernardo teaching. 

Working in Every Market
Graduates of John Jay’s Economics program have gone on to work in a variety of different sectors across the world, making the degree a real opportunity maker. “Economics is a well-respected degree that combines theory with asking the big questions, you also develop your writing and quantitative skills—skills that are essential in any field. With a degree in Economics, your career possibilities are endless,” says Dhondt. “Our graduates go on to law school, medical school, Ph.D. programs, or to earn their master’s degree. Some go on to work in corporate America, while others work for government and non-profit agencies, and some join the NYPD and FDNY.” The far-reaching success of its alumni is a testament to the Economics department’s ability to truly see and uplift its students, helping to bring a degree in Economics, and all the advantages that come from that degree, to populations often left out of the grander, national Economics narrative. “On the first day of class, when students leave our Economics classrooms, our hope is that we made them excited to learn and understand the world,” says Dhondt. “And when they walk away with that bachelor’s or master’s degree in Economics in hand, our hope is that they feel proud of themselves and of their journey at John Jay, and that they take what they’ve learned here, go out into the world, and ask the right questions.”

Christian Parenti sits down with Book Salon to discuss his latest book on Alexander Hamilton

In this episode, Christian Parenti discusses his book ‘Radical Hamilton: Economic Lessons from a Misunderstood Founder’, where he rewrites the history of early America and the global economy. For much of the twentieth century, Hamilton—sometimes seen as the bad boy of the founding fathers or portrayed as the patron saint of bankers—was out of fashion. In contrast his rival Thomas Jefferson, the patrician democrat and slave owner who feared government overreach, was claimed by all. But more recently, Hamilton has become a subject of serious interest again.